Welcome to our resource for MG Car Information.
|
MG Midget and Sprite Technical - b engine in midget
hi all, i have had a look around the archives looking at various engines that have been fitted to the midget.dont seem to see anyone who has fitted the 1800 b engine and box. has anyone any knowledge on this. thanks bob. |
trebor |
The works has done this to 1 or 2 cars MK1's I believe. And one of the ausies on here has done it. Nice periode conversion. But not so popular now since it needs a lot of work and the power is not that good. If you want the easy power a K or other modern engine will be the same amount of work and give a more reliable engine with more power. |
Onno Könemann |
Plus the 1800 makes a great ship anchor in cat 5 hurricanes is my understanding Prop |
Prop |
it is the combo of engine and box B-series and 4 synchro with OD is realy heavy. lose the OD loses weigth take a 3 syncro loses even more. but compared to a A-series with a ribcase is still heavy. |
Onno Könemann |
Trebor, Prop is right. It's an anchor compared to modern ally engines which push out far far more power. The work involved in the conversion would be just as much. If I was to do another conversion I would use the latest Ford engine. That's just a personal choice. |
Neil K |
I'd like to do a B series conversion. Just for the fun of it. A recreation of the Works midget MKI with the B engine would be nice. As I recal it was set back a fair amount making it more mid engined. Fitted with the old 3 bearing 3 syncro pull handle engine combo it would make for a nice torqy engine in a reasonably light car. You should not see it as a midget with the most power but as a nice period mod But with the MKII and de D type I have enough projects for the forseeable future ;) |
Onno Könemann |
I had a customer who had a B series engined Midget years ago. The car was lively in a straight line but a pig in corners. (As it was in may other respects ... not a good example of a conversion.) |
Paul Walbran |
I wouldn't do it. Its a really heavy engine and only puts out around 100 bhp in standard trim. I reckon it would ruin the car. |
Mike Howlett |
I built mine years ago, just as a test car to try a few ideas out with a heap of bits and pieces I had. Ended up with a 2300cc B engine in a lightweight body . It tipped the scales at 520kg dry and was magic to drive It had the engine back a bit and with me in it had 50/50 weight distribution which was ok but not ideal Working on another body setup now and planing for 55% rear which should be great I hope For a road car there are better options as the guys here have said but for a nostalgic style racer it's an option worth thinking about and lots of hairy fun. Cheers Willy |
William Revit |
I don't know... if it were up to me, I'd shy away from fitting any engine that would be heavier than the all-iron A series or Triumph 1500 units while providing only a minimal improvement in power. Many have used the Rover K-series, and in my opinion, this is an ideal swap, the K being light and quite powerful for its weight. And apparently they're not hard to come by on your side of the pond. Much has been said about the K-series pro and con, but for a sports car application it sure makes more sense to me. And for that matter, a well-tuned A can be a delightful, and potent, powerplant. -:G:- |
Gryf Ketcherside |
There are ways to reduce weight and increase power on a b series, Alloy crossflow head, alloy backplate, tubular manifold, alloy sump, 5 speed box etc. However it will never make economic sense compared to a K series, and it may never reach the same power to weight ratio. |
BH Harvey |
Do keep in mind the Toyota 4age,not as much aplied as the Kseries but that just down to not having a installationkit available. If you want to go period go for Jaguar 4.2ltr as done in the legendary "Fright"! |
Arie de Best |
arie any pictures about of the fright. would love to see them. |
trebor |
Trebor, check this: http://www.spriteparts.com.au/garage/fright.html |
Arie de Best |
and a bit more ....
|
Arie de Best |
or this more recent done to an absolute stunning quality!!!
|
Arie de Best |
There is some youtube action too of this beast!
|
Arie de Best |
Holy mackrel. Now that's what I call a conversion. Did you read the caption under the last picture on the link you posted about the Fright? "That same year, I had a Mini Cooper 'S' and when it broke down on a motorway Alan towed me home at over 120 mph!" Shame that spirit is dead and gone now. Is it though? |
Lawrence Slater |
nop it is alive down under |
Onno Könemann |
Then agian it would be hard to beat a loud screaming climax...Deb can help you accomplish that....my understanding is she is a climax expert ....hahaha Prop...or Piggy ????, lol. |
Prop |
Trebor Check this one out, V8 and four wheel drive, http://www.flickr.com/photos/albertsbite/2414091931/ Good talking to you at Battlesbridge, as I mentioned I've been thinking about a K series conversion, keep us informed. Bob |
R.A Davis |
Glad some of you guys see an alternative to the K series motor - the retro thing is important to some of us at least. I fitted (against all recommendations) a 1300 Ford crossflow, and it's just fantastic. 80 bhp at the wheels on twin 40s is plenty with a low axle ratio, and it is dead simple and screams out at 8000. Not as economical though!. A climax motor would be absolutely the bees knees, but really expensive these days. In the sixties a mate had one of the proper Brabham Midgets, and reckoned 90mph in third, loads lighter overall and handled like a Seven on rails. Anyway - I for one prefer the simplicity and robustness of older proven motors, and they sound great too..... |
D le Versha |
I'd like a Climax enginer under the bonnet, too. But as you say, they are rare and have high costs to acquire/rebuild. With a 'modern' (which are all pretty robust these days) you can replace rather than re-build. The Zetec and the KSeries (and others) look more 'period' if you remove the plastic covers, mount them vertically (makes a big difference), and run them on carbs. Here's a pic of Mark Reeve's vertical modern (there's a dissy at the back); with twin-40s instead of a plenum, it would look more 60's. A |
Anthony Cutler |
... in case you were wondering... the JPG... A |
Anthony Cutler |
Antony You nailed it exactly.... I love the looks of a 2-3 decade old engine, theres just nothing like them...they just look doable with a few tools...todays engines looks like something you need a nasa rocket collage docterates degree just to change the spark plugs, and in some cases... Im not that far off from the truth But yeah... I love a lump of steel with a dissy and a carb or 2 or 3.... Heck how about a carb for each clyinder...hahaha Just sexy Prop |
Prop |
This thread was discussed between 24/09/2011 and 01/10/2011
MG Midget and Sprite Technical index
This thread is from the archive. The Live MG Midget and Sprite Technical BBS is active now.