Welcome to our resource for MG Car Information.
|
MG Midget and Sprite Technical - MGOC Stage 2 1275
Does anyone have any experience of these rebuilds? Roughly what power output assuming the appropriate SUs fitted? |
G Williams (Graeme) |
hey graeme do you have a link ? the problem with stage designations are there not universial ive seen some examples.of a stage 2 engine that where little more then a set of K&N air filters and a larger 3 in one exhauste header and a fresh new coat of red paint btw FYI...red paint is the fastest and easist way to add 5 HP...I know, it worked for me. prop |
Prop and the Blackhole Midget |
75ish I've heard though I would also look at the usual engine builders who can tailor to your specific wishes for example http://www.skiptune.com/products/engines |
Onno K |
Hi Prop Can't copy and paste spec, but I'll see if I can find another way. THere isn't a link just a spec sheet which you need to ask for. The obvious thing, which I've now done, is to ask them too. Whether they will say or whether they might worry that it's taken as a warranty we will see. |
G Williams (Graeme) |
Onno: I've never really looked at power improvements. Current is what (find handbook) 68 bhp? What would be reasonable and still keep the car tractable... 80? 85? Your estimate at 75 doesn't seem much extra grunt.. is that what I should expect? |
G Williams (Graeme) |
I think that MGOC use Ivor Searle http://www.ivorsearle.co.uk/mg_engines.htm |
Dave O'Neill2 |
That would make sense as they are both in the same neck of the woods. My current recon is an Ivor Searle. It does look as though they just turn out "standard" units though, not anything special. |
G Williams (Graeme) |
there are lies, damned lies and claimed power IIRC 64bhp was BL's claimed figure when the (1275) cars were new, what method or standard of measurement they used to get this figure I don't know I'd say if the rest of the car is in good condition and good operation 80/85 bhp would be tractable in a standard car, perhaps if the gearbox and halfshafts are a little shaky they might be weak spots what ever you have at the engine then gets diluted by the transmission, tyres etc. the engine's potential power also relies on good induction, exhaust, ignition, timing, carbs, etc. then you have power to weight, a heavy lunch for some drivers will drop the car's p:w by a percentage or two |
Nigel Atkins |
you might consider one of those ebay universial electric turbo chargers...they "claim" around 50 hp pending which advert your reading....and there only around $50 so if you have duel carbs... youwould need 2, thats a whopping 100 extra hp on top of your factory 68 HP so thats a grand total of 168 hp all for only $100 now that sounds inticing..lol http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=230795064229&index=6&nav=SEARCH&nid=25585355603 prop |
Prop and the Blackhole Midget |
only 164 so not so good for $100 |
Nigel Atkins |
oh your right... I forgot the tires rob HP.... yeah... not to good a deal, 16.4 HP per dollar just isnt a good return... prop |
Prop and the Blackhole Midget |
OH... Electric turbos are back on.the menu....look at what I just found... DUEL ELECTIC (compounded) TURBOS.... thats 4 turbos so thats what 50 hp x 4 turbos plus the (64) factory hp .... thats 264 HP... for only $129.00 dont do it... please dont even consider it...you would need new everything to drive that wonken beast...brakes, suspension, tranny, rearend, tire and wheels... it would be completely "undriveable" ....hahaha check out the discription... thats almost criminal http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=330741999533&cmd=VIDESC |
Prop and the Blackhole Midget |
hmmm its so turbo fast it updated the ebay page before I could.shout out....horse sh^t !!! better buy fast... its now $149 lol... prop http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=330741999533&index=2&nav=SEARCH&nid=89663305566 |
Prop and the Blackhole Midget |
my A had a self ported to Vizard guidelines big valve MG metro head with LCB and twin 1.5 inch carbs on a ported manifold. it made 75bhp and 88 lbft. It ate 2 A series gearboxes (stripped the teeth off 2nd and 3rd respectively) and is currently eating a third one (input shaft bearing) in dad's car. it has enough poke to make you think you need another gear on top of the 4 speed. All the 'stages' are different - I think stage 2 is bigger valves and a bit of light porting generally. Engines come in stages too which don't always match up to the head stages.. |
Rob Armstrong |
Rob, are you meaning output at rear road wheels whereas we were on about output from engine |
Nigel Atkins |
my A 1293 uses a Slark unleaded BV head 11:1 CR with LCB etc standard carbs, standard cam and on their RR produced 74 BHP at the flywheel. Bigger carbs would give another 5 BHP or so. Rebuilt the transmission at the time the engine was done (3 years ago) and this has been fine. Its fun to drive, returns decent MPG yet is tractable and practical in London traffic and on the open road. I agree an extra cog would be nice! |
Bob Beaumont |
THe MGOC engine produces "around 12%" which would raise 64 bhp to around 72. Skiptune (mentioned by Onno) are talking about 80/85 bhp. How much could you push through a standard gearbox without breaking anything. Then there's the vulnerable halfshafts..... |
G Williams (Graeme) |
I think providing the gearbox is in good repair and the oil levels properly maintained then all should be well. I think what happens is the engine is uprated and bolted to a gearbox that already has done a fair few thousand miles and it gives up in disgust. i would not pretend the transmission is the most reliable but I beleive proper maintenance and ensuring the components are in good order goes a long way to ensuring longevity I renewed all the bearings in mine and checked for wear on the gears/shafts etc and ensured all the tolerances were within manufactures specifications and its been fine so far. The other option is a 5 speed conversion of course. I think the half shafts are OK providing they are the later spec and that the car is driven with a degree of compassion! |
Bob Beaumont |
>>How much could you push through a standard gearbox without breaking anything. Then there's the vulnerable halfshafts.....<< you don't read my posts do you :D |
Nigel Atkins |
But I do Nigel! But I was also hoping that someone could reflect actual experience like "I have 75bhp and have broken three half shafts and 4 gearboxes." |
G Williams (Graeme) |
I have +80bhp and no broken half shafts and after 5 years of hard use and abuse (and before that who knows how many by the PO)a noisy 1st and 2nd That is lot's of road miles (almost daily) and track and rally miles. So I'd say it is a tough little box! The basis (smooth case) was designed to cope with 50BHP max the upgrade (ribcase) handled 65BHP on crossply's |
Onno K |
Well I have almost 75 BHP and haven't broken anything so Nigel's original comment seems about right. |
Bob Beaumont |
My numbers were at the flywheel. Graeme - I had 75 bhp at the fly and killed 2 gearboxes and no halfshafts :D Though with kinder driving and less right boot you'd get them to last a bit longer. And I never had a new one. I've not broken any halfshafts or diffs, even with the K (110 ish bhp at fly). Plenty of the K-brigade are running standard diffs&halfshafts. Some more successfully than others... |
Rob Armstrong |
Thanks lads, that's all very encouraging. Onno: the people you suggested in your link (Skiptune) have been very helpful! |
G Williams (Graeme) |
I need to corect an error in my earlier post! The MGOC engine is expected to improve BHP by around 20%, not 12% as I stated. This would give about 76 or 77 bhp |
G Williams (Graeme) |
Speak to Peter Burgess. http://www.burgesstuning.free-online.co.uk/page3.html He's the most sensible person I've met in this area. There's a distinct lack of fancy showrooms, expensive cars in the car park, or unhelpful sales 'experts' You always get a straight answer from the horse's mouth with no BS. Couples with the fact that any expectations can be proved on his dyno. |
Dan Cusworth |
Rob, the numbers being at the flywheel suggests you possibly didn't need the twin 1.5" carbs, subject to condition of engine, with all you listed it might be that there is more to be had out of it |
Nigel Atkins |
May well be, but with the big hif carbs replacing small hs carbs I knew it wasn't limited by carbs. And I did port the head myself :-) so wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't up to commercial standards. But it was very very cheap |
Rob Armstrong |
Onno: You linked to Skiptune earlier in this thread - did they build your engine? |
G Williams (Graeme) |
Rob, I'm sure you'd have done a better job than some professionals |
Nigel Atkins |
This thread was discussed between 27/02/2013 and 02/03/2013
MG Midget and Sprite Technical index
This thread is from the archive. The Live MG Midget and Sprite Technical BBS is active now.