MG-Cars.net

Welcome to our resource for MG Car Information.

Recommendations

Parts

MG parts spares and accessories are available for MG T Series (TA, MG TB, MG TC, MG TD, MG TF), Magnette, MGA, Twin cam, MGB, MGBGT, MGC, MGC GT, MG Midget, Sprite and other MG models from British car spares company LBCarCo.

MG MGA - Pros and Cons on 3.9 rear axle conversion

Hello All,

I am seriously considering changing the rear axle of my 57 1500 to a 3.9 center section from an early MGB.

I understand that the big plus in this would be to cruise at lower RPM's at highway speed. My question is what impact will this new gear ratio have on the general drivability of the car? Will my acceleration, with mostly stock 1500 engine, be noticably slower? How about the ability to climb hills?

While I would really love to reduce the RPMS when on the highway I don't want to make the car uncomfortable to drive in the city.

Please share your opinions. PS I know that I will probably have to swap out the spider gears to make my MGA wire wheel axles work with the MGB diff.

Thanks
Rich Berger

On a 1600 there usually is no problem, but the 1500 already lacks power and a 3.9 will make your car slower on take off and climbing hills you will need to keep it in the same gear longer. The plus is lower RPM's and better mileage and makes it more of a freeway cruiser. Since I have a or had a 1600 engine, I can not talk about how slugest the car will be
JEFF BECKER

Rich

Like Jeff, I can't speak for the 1500 as I run the 1800 with the 5-speed box.

It certainly changes the way you drive, with each gear being 'longer', particularly useful in first and second. It took me a while to adapt to but I would not now part with it.

Steve
Steve Gyles

I drove a stock & well used 1500 Magnette for years with a 4.3 and seriously oversized tires, which came out about the same as a 3.9. No problems at all, in the western Pa hills. You do have to stay in lower gears a bit longer, but not a problem; 1 & 2 are so low anyway that they just get more useful. Also drove a 1500 A a lot w/ 3.9, same deal. What people don't realize is that since ratios multiply, the big gaps in the lower gear spacings get less annoying, and it puts third right where you want it for highway passing.

FRM
FR Millmore

If your car used to take 20 seconds to get from 0-60, its now going to take 20.4 seconds or some minimal change and more then likely, you were not running it to the limits every time you accelerate anyways!

Going up extreme grades or up mountains, you will have to downshift Sooner.

So, it will effect you negatively in 1% of your driving but will give you better fuel economy, lower noise, lessen the vibration and engine wear. which will benifit you 89.6% of the time.

Going from a 4.3 to a 3.909 is not a big jump. I think most 1.6 and 1.8L motors could handle a 3.7 if they would have been issued stock.

Choice? Not really. Its something that should be done if at all possible for most cars unless you want to have the exact feel of a car as came from the factory.

-BMC.
BMC Brian McCullough

Rich
I just came back from The British Invasion in Stowe Vermont and was pulling 3700 RPM to keep my MGA Coupe 1500 cc at 60 MPH. Sitting on my workbench at home was a 3.9 rear end that I wish I had installed.

My estimate would be that on the highway (with a 3.9/1500cc) I would expect 60 MPH at app. 3200 RPM's. Taking this higher I would then assume at 3700 RPM I would be seeing closer to 68/70 MPH and 4000 RPM should give me about 75 MPH. This would offer me 65 MPH at 3500 RPM. To me this is a perfect highway cruise limit for my LBC.

What I want is a better cruiser on the highway, with a comforatble 65 MPH all day steady cruising speed and a passing speed when necessary.

Is the MGA 1500 engine capable ....yes. Will it bother my inter-city driving..I don't think so as normally 1st gear is very low and quickly get changed up into 2nd while city driving. 3rd and 4th are used but normally at lower RPM's in the ctiy.

FR has it right ( as is generally the case & thank you). The 1500 engine can handle a 3.9 rear diff.
Gordon
Gordon Harrison

Gordon,

To make the calculations a bit easier I have made up some Microsoft Excel spreadsheets on gear ratios and the resulting speeds.
They also calculate the torque at the wheels for the different gearbox and rear end ratios.

http://www.angelfire.com/amiga/mga/index.html


Mick
Mick Anderson

There may have been some problems accessing that website. It is OK now.

Mick
Mick Anderson

Thanks for all the good information. I was able to purchase a entire early MGB rear axle for a very low price at our British Car show last weekend in St. Louis.

I have taken out the differential and axles. I think I will make a winter project out of replacing the thrust washers and the fiber washers in the dif and changing over to the 3.9.

Looking forward to cruising at a lower RPM next summer.

Again thanks for all the info and especially for that neat program that calculates the speed for the various gear ratios.
Rich Berger

With a 3.9 in my 1500 ZA I found it difficult to start off after stopping on a steep incline (although the ZA weighs a good bit more than an MGA). I think that a 4.1 would be just about right, however with an 1800 the 3.9 would be the cat's whiskers.

Rich in Vancouver
Rich McKIe

Actually the 3.9 diff works fine...especially with my 3.5 V8 :)
just kidding guys, just kidding!!
Mark Mathiesen

Rich

You either have short winters over there or you work slow! I swapped over the diffs (including the splined drive gears) in an afternoon. For those unfamiliar with the process, Barney has a very good illustrated step-by-step article. But I guess changing the thrust washers is a bit longer an operation.

Perhaps worth changing the diff front oil seal during the changeover while you still have easy access. I did it after installation, following the discovery of an oil leak, and found it bit of a game lying on my back under the car. Probably better on the workbench provided you can hold the unit to get enough torque on the end nut (about 135/140ft lbs). I made up a tool to hold the UV flange steady so that I could torque the nut - see image.

Steve


Steve Gyles

Steve

You must know that my friends say I work by the calendar and not the clock!

I really don't want to stop driving the car when the fall weather might just be getting good. If I wait till the end of the season I can probably take care of someother jobs at the same time such as new brake shoes.


Glad to hear that you like the combination of the 3.9 and the MGA.
Rich Berger

In a clean MGA the switching of a rear differential takes app. 2 hours,with the cluster gear switch included. Saying this I would advise the following....get a new set of rear axle hub paper seals....change the pinion seal while the unit is out....before installing the 3.9 have it looked at by an expert (ie: check backlash/bearing condition etc) and replace the differential over gasket and fluids.

One point of frustration is the non-available copper/brass thrush washers. New repro ones are fiber units and I am sure will not last as long as good metal ones. If some one knows where to get these metat thrush washers please let us know.

So,due to the ease of swithcing differential, the actual trial and error test is not so painfull. Pull the 4.3 and try the 3.9...decide how you like it and then make your decision.
Gordon
Gordon Harrison

Your most noticeable change will be in reverse. Be prepared!
David Werblow

Daid
Care to enlighten us further on that statement?
Gordon
Gordon Harrison

Gordon, I suspect David means that the car will back up quicker with the 3.9 than you're accustomed to.
Andy Bounsall

To be honest I have never noticed the slightest bit of differenece when reversing. By and large it is done balancing the throttle against a "slipping clutch", while half twisted round in the seat with one arm over the back of the passenger seat. The rest of my physical effort is spent turning a 14 inch steering wheel!

Steve
Steve Gyles

Gordon

My 58 has a 3.9 and 3700 is just about 70 mph, which is what is necessary to keep up with traffic in the morning commute.

From what I have read there was a 3.9 option for the MGA. Question to those who have the early MGB axle installed: are the wheel studs the same diameter as the MGA or a size larger (diameter) as used on the later Bs? My rear hubs have the smaller wheel studs and I am questioning if it was really from an A or could it be from an early B? Or where the studs replaces somewhere in its past?

Larry
58A
Larry Hallanger

"In a clean MGA the switching of a rear differential takes app. 2 hours"

My record lying under the car at the track was in the order of 40 minutes, not necessarily observing all niceties...:_)
Bill Spohn

Bill,

Just like all you racing guys....trying to do everything faster....LOL / LOL

Gordon
Gordon Harrison

Larry, -- here was indeed an original 3.91 final drive option for the MGA. There are also part numbers for the matching speedometers in MPH and KPH, but they are so rare that you will likely never see one in your lifetime. I had Moma convert my speedometer from 1450 to 1325 tpm by changing the final odometer drive sprocket from 58 to 53 teeth, and re-magnetize the armature to make the speed reading correct.

MGB wheel studs are 1/2" where MGA studs are 7/16". Otherwise the banjo axle housings are essentially the same (except Twin Cam & Deluxe), and all the working parts are interchangeable, bearing hubs, half shafts, and the whole differential assembly (given matching splines in the differential sun gears). Brake backing plates with cylinders, shoes, drums, and handbrake cable are also interchangeable as a set. Twin Cam axle has the end flanges rotated about 15 degrees to accommodate the Dunlop calipers, and Twin Cam half shafts are interchangeable with WW half shafts in the narrower WW axle housing.

If you want to install the late model (post 1967) Salsbury axle (tube type) in the MGA or early MGB, you can use the original leaf springs and lever shocks, but everything else is different, including the U-bolts.
Barney Gaylord

Andy is right on! For me it was more noticeable backing out of the driveway than on the highway.
David Werblow

Barney

Any way to tell if the rear axle housing was originally from an A or a B? It does have 7/16" studs. My car was, prior to my ownership, a restoration project in a High School auto shop class. I was told it was assembled from (at least) two different cars to make one whole one. No telling what part came from what car. Is is possible that an early B rear axle assembly was used with the B hubs replaced with those from an A?

Thanks

Larry
58A
Larry Hallanger

I mentioned in my first post that the 3.9 diff makes the gears 'longer'. I am not a racer, so I don't normally push the revs past about 4000. Driving to work today, therefore, under normal driving conditions on a fairly clear road, I had a look to see what speeds I routinely changed gear whilst accelerating.

1st to 2nd - 18-20mph
2nd to 3rd - 34-36mph
3rd to 4th - 52-55mph
4th to 5th - 65-70mph

I think that sort of gear/speed usage is quite comparable to many modern Euroboxes and the MGA certainly felt very lively with plenty of spare power in hand if anyone wanted to sit on my bumper (paranoid about cars sitting on my tail at the moment).

Once settled down in the cruise and back to legal speeds, 5th held 50mph quite comfortably at I think it was 2300RPM.

Steve

PS. I get my Beemer back tomorrow from its rear-ender - nearly a 6 week rebuild.
Steve Gyles

Rich,
I fitted a 3.9 to my '56 1500 (all stock otherwise)roadster some years ago, and it works well. Reduced revs make a big difference - 4000 rpm at cruising speed is about 70 mph (speedo no longer accurate). Made the drive from Vancouver to Minneapolis in 2001 much more pleasant despite the 40 degree Celcius temperatures across most of Montana and Dakotas(about 104 degrees F). No problem with this diff on the hills, or mountains as they are called in BC.
One draw back - I can now hear the missus (also known as the passenger side air bag!)
Peter.
P. Tilbury

To correct the speedo reading, isn't it possible to just use a B speedo - the gearbox is the same as an A as far as the internals are concerned.

dominic clancy

Larry, -- If someone was listing rear axle serial numbers you might be able to tell from that, but what's the difference? A and B parts through 1967 are all the same (considering inboard splines) until you get out to the brake backing plates. If it has MGA hubs with 7/16" studs it is the MGA configuration.

Dominic, -- Early MGB gearbox uses different speedometer drive gear ratio (inside the gearbox) to turn the speedometer considerably slower, something like 1280 vs 1450 turns per mile, so no go.
Barney Gaylord

Dominic,
Also, MGB wheels are 14 inches diameter. So the speedo really needs to be recalibrated. I put a GPS on the dash when I'm concerned about the speed limits in BC (far too low!)
Peter.
P. Tilbury

Barney curious about you had the armature re magnetised to correct speedo reading.
How did they do that? surely going with the conventional method would have been far better wouldn't it?
Bob (robert) Chairman north lincs and district pigeon fanciers society

The speedometer magnet is not a permanent magnet but is an iron bar magnet, so the magnetic strength can be changed. If you have the right tool re-magnetizing the armature is a snap. It is a big electromagnet with an electrical voltage/current control to set the strength of the magnetic field. You increase the field strength by increasing current in the electromagnet.

If you need to reduce the magnet strength you could start by degausing the magnet to make it near zero field strength, and then remagnetize it to the desired level, but it's quicker just to re-magnetize it in the opposite polarity to the desired level.

FWIW, I think this IS the conventional method.
Barney Gaylord

No the conventional method is to set the zero by moving the pointer and the span (top range) by adjusting the spring acting against the turning shaft. I have never heard of remagnetising to correct errors before. Maybe an american thing?
Bob (robert) Chairman north lincs and district pigeon fanciers society

When my 4.3 differential self-destructed (see pictures) I replaced it with an early MGB 3.9, but used MGA axle gears so the splines weren't an issue. The only negative effect I've noticed is that occasionally when I turn onto a road with an uphill grade I need to take it in second instead of third to keep the engine from lugging a little. As far as I can tell, the speedometer isn't any less accurate now than it was before. It seemed like before it was reading a little fast, now it's reading a little slow. Since it's the least important gauge in the car, re-calibrating it hasn't been a big priority. But, it does make the occasional freeway run (I try to avoid freeways when driving it - no fun there) a lot more soothing.



David Breneman

Here's another shot of the destroyed differential. Yeah, that's a chunk of the bearing wedged in there.



David Breneman

I have a 3.9 in my ZA (originally 4.85) and fitted a replacement speedo from an unknown model Magnette when mine packed it in.
Things here are complicated a bit as speeds are posted in kilometers which normally calls for a 1.6 multiplication, however I was pleased to find that with the above mods I simply have to multiply the indicated speed x2 to get my speed in KM/H.
I suppose that a 50% reducer gearbox from Speedograph Richfield or others would make things even simpler.

Cheers,
Richard
Rich McKIe

Guys,
The MGA hub is a slightly smaller overall diameter than the banjo MGB's, along with their corresponding insets in the brake drum. So even if an MGA hub and axle had 1/2" studs an MGB brake drum would have a sloppy fit over the hub. An MGA drum, even with the holes drilled out to 1/2" would NOT fit over MGB hubs. This would probably never be an issue since MGB banjo rear axles with steel wheels are exceedingly rare, but it is something to be aware of.
Wade Keene

I believe that he racers have snatched up all of the MGB banjos. Does anyone know if the MGA 10 spline axle can take the torque of a warmed up 3 main 1800 engine? As I understand it, the racers covet the banjo axle not only for the 3.9 but also for the 25 spline ends. Any comments?
James Johanski

When my differential blew, many people more knowledgable than I (including some folks here) assured me that it could not be the differential, as the axle is the weak link in the chain and is a constant point of failure. Well, $1200 later the axles are fine and I have a new differential, so the axles can't be as delicate as their reputation suggests. My car has a 5-main 1800 engine installed by a PO some time in the 70s or early 80s. There's nothing custom on my engine except the backing plate, but in the 20 years I've owned it (well, OK, 12 of those years were under a tarp) axles haven't been an issue, FWIW.
David Breneman

James, the fine spline axles are indeed stronger, but you can get by on the street with the coarse and a tuned engine.

I've been racing using an engine with more double the power and 50% more torque of an MGA 1500 for many years and have managed with coarse spline - the only one I've broken was on a stock engined street car.

They will break when they want to, but I doubt adding a few horses to a street 3 main MGB will increase the chances that much.
Bill Spohn

Why would 25 fine splines be stronger than ten (10) beefy splines? Would not the larger amount of thick steel ,between the splines be far stronger than the fine V shaped teeth?
Gordon
Gordon Harrison

Gearbox first motion shafts and axle splines with more teeth are stronger than splines of the same diameter with less teeth because of the way the load is transferred. As the load is passed from one tooth to the next the tooth designer tries to have the load passed smoothly to the next tooth from the previous tooth.
It is much easier to have a smoother take up of load with more teeth.

Also, the later MGA splines have an involute tooth shape. I have an article on what an involute shape is on my website.

http://www.angelfire.com/amiga/mga/index.html

A word of warning. The article may only be understood by engineers.

Mick
Mick Anderson

To be more accurate I should use the words "load transfer" for gears and "load sharing" for splines.

Mick
Mick Anderson

Strength of the spline is not a problem. I have never known the straight 10-tooth spline nor any of the finer pitch involute splines to shear (until someone says otherwise). It is the strength of the shaft that is different. The larger straight splines are cut deeper into the shaft. That makes the root diameter smaller, and the shaft with the smaller root diameter will break with less torque. The half shaft fracture usually occurs immediately at the side of the differential sun gear, at the point of interface of the ends of the splines in the sun gear. I have a very good picture of this, see attachment.

Any of these shafts and splines have a very large safety factor for the expected load. The shear failure is ultimately the result of a fatigue crack that may develop after many years of service.

It is not the engine torque or power that determines the peak load on the drive train, it is the grip of the tires on the pavement. A stock 1500 engine is capable of spinning the tires in 1st gear if you get the flywheel wound up enough. A 150 HP race engine with a competition clutch will spin the tires with exactly the same axle torque, given the same tires and same vehicle weight. What does put more load on the drive axles is using sticky racing tires. If the tires have 50% more grip, and you apply enough input torque to spin the tires, you will put 50% more torque through the half shafts. In most cases this will still not break the halfshafts.

I had used sticky race tires for autocross nearly every weekend during the driving season for several years (in the last decade). For a few years I also used a competition pressure plate. That could produce a fair amount of tire spin on the 1-2 up shift, and a little spinning of the tires on a 2-3 up shift with a quick shift under power near engine red line, even with the stock 1500 engine. It is the inertia of the flywheel that contains and releases this energy during a high speed power shift, producing enough torque to spin the tires a bit in 3rd gear (with a strong enough clutch). Autocrossing every weekend may not produce as many track miles as a vintage racer does in a year, but it definitely does produce more jackrabbit starts and likely just as many power shifts.

I autocrossed regularly for several years on race tires (maybe 2000 very harsh laps) without ever breaking one of my 10-spline half shafts. Then a few years later one of the half shafts failed during a casual drive home after a casual road rally on street tires with no power shifting going on. This just happened to be time for that fatigue crack to show its nature (see picture). This happened at 340,000 miles on my MGA original rear axle. YMMV. I now keep a spare halfshaft on hand, as I have good reason to expect the other one to fail in due time, having served through the same long term duty cycles.

Cars used regularly for competition work are likely to fail halfshafts more often. I do not believe the involute spline shafts are immune to this problem, but they may last a little longer before they fail.

The solution for this is to have the halfshafts checked for cracks occasionally as periodic maintenance, using magnaflux or ultrasound or dye penetrant, and replace any part that may have a crack before it fails in service. As a follow up, I would like to know if anyone has had a halfshaft failure after having it checked for cracks.



Barney Gaylord

Whenever I remove and replace half shafts I always mark them "right" and "left" and replace them that way. I believe that half shafts in use develop a very small twist under repeated high loads. This could cause breakage, after some time, if the twist direction is reversed.
I have not proven this, but take the precaution anyway.
New shafts can be used on either side.
Does anyone else do this?

Mick
Mick Anderson

I have a steel wheel car and on one of my half shafts, the disc at the outer end that drives the wheel broke cleanly from the shaft (at the weld if it is a weld?). I believe this is not unknown on midgets but fortunately seems rare on the MGA - or am I wrong and have just been lucky. What is the racing experience of this failure mode.

I was reversing out of the garage at the time.

Malcolm
Malcolm Asquith

I am going to install a 3.9 ring & pinion into a TD (with a Volvo engine. My customer has purchased a gear set marked BTB316, can any one verify that this gear set is from a MGA? If so, I need a MGA pinion flange to complete the job. T.I.A. Len
Len Fanelli

This thread was discussed between 18/09/2007 and 25/09/2007

MG MGA index

This thread is from the archive. The Live MG MGA BBS is active now.