Welcome to our resource for MG Car Information.
|
MG MGF Technical - MGF Technical
Why would a 1.6 engine be any cheaper than a 1.8 to produce? So why not use the 1.8 and downgrade the trim. My question now, who has had experience with their MGF with rear shocks bursting through the top mounts, or at least cracking the mounts? Answers please to the MGOC race team at Cambridge. Thanks Darryl |
Darryl Davis |
Darryl The remours I have heard are that the 1600 F will also have cheaper trim to get the price down. Heard mention of steel wheels. Of course the car manafactures want you to choose the most expesive models because they have more margin in them - I am sure it will be no difference with Alchemy! Cheers Patrick |
Patrick |
Does anyone know the details of the contract between Rover and Mayflower concerning body prices and if after a set period of time or a set number of cars produced the unit cost alters. IF such a scenario exists, and I know the enthusiasm from Mayflower to extend the range, (more bodies made by them) then there is room to both reduce reduce retail price and maintain sufficient margin. Then again who is to say what the margins are and what is acceptable?? Rog |
Roger Parker |
>> So why not use the 1.8 and downgrade the trim. << Hmm, which really nice items of the standard interior trim would they leave out?? It looks pretty grim without all the carbon fibre/wood effect/alu extras already, doesn't it?? Stefan |
Stefan Gibney |
This thread was discussed between 02/04/2000 and 06/04/2000
MG MGF Technical index
This thread is from the archive. The Live MG MGF Technical BBS is active now.