Welcome to our resource for MG Car Information.
MG TD TF 1500 - A real resoration
This came off of a corvette site, but I thought it was applicable regardless of what side of the topic your at. Boy, it really galls my threads when these ignoramuses go off about how the Corvette crowd is 'over-restoring' cars! I say, restored means *exactly* as the factory did it, no matter what. I spent 95 weeks last year doing an accurate and complete ground-up restoration on my '67. And, let me tell you, some of those rubber and glass pieces are *really* hard to restore after grinding them up! For some folks, simply applying a bit of overspray while painting is 'good enough.' I scoff at this. I meticulously copied onto the mufflers, droplet by droplet, the exact overspray pattern that was there originally. Even the runs and sags at the bottom of the door panels were duplicated. Your average 'restorer' will just slap some new paint on, calling it 'original' if it is the same color. Jeeez. I chemically removed every vestige of *the original paint*, then broke it down, reformulated it, and re-applied it. Sure, I had to use substitute volatile carrier (thinner), but since it evaporates anyway, I claim that it was not originally 'on the car' when it left the factory gates. Some folks think using the 'correct' fasteners is good enough. Ha! I made sure to cross-thread the left rear upper transmission crossmember bolt, just as the (sometimes inebriated) factory worker was known to. I removed the third from the right lower grille attachment screw, which a previous owner had erroneously installed, in spite of the well-documented fact that none of these were installed at the factory until after 3:43 pm on October 17th, 1966. I made sure to scratch the frame in the appropriate places, just as the handling mechanisms at the factory did. Some previous owner had removed the scratches, in an effort to make the car 'perfect.' What was he thinking? I even installed the #3 cylinder's exhaust lifter upside down, which was a rare (1 of 3 such built), but documented occurrence. Sure, it runs like hell, but hey, it's _original_! Some folks get a new set of tires that LOOK like the originals, and call that good enough. Not me. I got THE ORIGINAL tires out of a landfill, ground them up, and restored them. I was able to find about 91.7% of the rubber which had worn off, by vacuuming the roadside dust over the roads the car had travelled, and separating out the correct molecules from the other debris with a mass-spectrographic double-diathermic isopropadiaphanometer molecular identifier. NOT cheap, let me tell you. But, correct is correct. Some folks put on new valve stems and caps, and away they go. We purists know that it IS important to align the seam line on the valve cap to the correct angle, just as it left the factory ('indexed' valve caps, Section T-26-B.5 of the Official Sniveler's Guide to CORRECT Corvette Assembly). Changing the oil is considered routine by some 'restorers'. They throw out the old, slap in some new, maybe even 'improved' oil, and a new filter. Not a real purist. I have the original oil broken down and re-refined. The old additives are removed, restructured, and re- added. I even recover as many molecules of the burned or dripped oil as possible, and add them back in. This means the filter must be dismantled, which ruins the case, so it has to be remelted and reformed into a filter. Re-using the original paint, of course. Some bozos throw in a Sears Die-Hard, and off they go. Some so- called restorers buy a reproduction 'tar-top' battery, and call THAT good enough (*scoff*). I found my original battery and remanufactured it. No wimpy replacing the innards with new, either. I melted down the original plates, then recast them in the correct factory molds. Saving the original electrolyte, of course. Now, you might think, gee, that seems pretty far-fetched, this guy is extreme. Well, you ain't seen nothing yet. I also was able to procure the original ELECTRONS which had come with the car, and reinstall them. It seems that over the years, the car had given and recieved a few jump starts, and some of the original electrons had thus transferred to other vehicles, and some from other cars had contaminated my car. Thankfully, there is an electron sorting and ID accessory for the molecular identifier, which allowed me to correct this blatant slap to true_ originality. One thing holds me back from being 100% correct. Some fool of a previous owner had changed the tires, and did not retain the original air. I know, hard to believe, but it happened- some folks just don't 'get it.' Now, I have located about 24.6% of the original air molecules with the Mass-Spectragraphic double diathermic isopropa diaphanometer, but many of them have been sucked into other engines, combusted, and turned into CO, CO2, NOx, etc. If anyone is aware of a device to spot the correct air molecules after they have been broken up and combined in other chemicals, please let me know. I guess I COULD settle for some air molecules from the Bowling Green tire-mounting area vicinity, captured about 9:47 am on September 5th, 1966. Ah, well, it's only a few points off at showtime... Regards Bruce |
BEC Cunha |
Bruce, I also own a corvette and to see some of the restored ones that go thru BJ and other auctionsites is unreal. Over restoration is a problem in all the cars nowdays. I loved the thing that you sent however, funny.. Sometimes methinks folks take this restoration stuff a wee far.... |
TRM Maine |
Bruce, I can't help but be impressed. Especially collecting the original rubber dust. In a Wisconsin winter, that must have indeed, been a cold job. The restorers in California and Florida wouldn't understand, but I do. But how did you separate the original rubber dust from the snow? I don't know how you did it but I did it by using a spectral inferometer which rejected the rubber dust of other makes. The remaining dust I dissolved in MEK causing rubber nodules to form. I then did impact and density tests to be sure I was right, and by God ... I was. Really quite simple when you get down to it. But ... IT IS ORIGINAL ... yknow what I mean, huh? Gord Clark Rockburn, Qué. |
Gordon A Clark |
Gordon. Methinks you have spent too much liesure time in the imbibing room.Not enough with your neighbors maple grove.You might teach her the true meaning of human relations or the way they should be. Sandy |
SANDY SANDERS |
And it was flourescent pink you painted it after all that! Dave |
D Moore |
What's a corvette? Bill McGee |
Bill McGee |
A corvette was sometimes called a faimile. It was an all wooden ship that was powered by Packard Merlins (3). I believe it was used as a subchaser or minesweeper during WW 2. From a fading memory (second sign of old age) the length was 60 or so feet long.It was moulded plywood. Magnetic underwater mines were not attracted to it. Sandy |
SANDY SANDERS |
cor⋅vette /kɔrˈvɛt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kawr-vet] –noun 1. a warship of the old sailing class, having a flush deck and usually one tier of guns. 2. a lightly armed, fast ship used mostly for convoy escort and ranging in size between a destroyer and a gunboat. |
James Neel |
I believe Canada had a huge number of Corvettes.... there was one in the town I grew up in converted to a private yacht..... |
gblawson |
Sandy, I always thought the boat you are describing was a PT boat, or Patrol Torpedo. I think Corvettes were mostly made of steel. warmly, dave |
Dave Braun |
Bruce, Thanks for posting this one...I needed a good laugh! That's what I love about this BBS. 16 hours in airport using airport transfers sevenoakss to get from Ceadar Rapids IA. to Columbus, OH. yesterday....could have driven it in 8...I was ready for a good laugh. Merry Christmas, David |
David Sheward |
The first modern corvettes were the Flower class (Royal Navy corvettes were named after flowers, and ships in Royal Canadian Navy service took the name of smaller Canadian cities and towns). Their chief duty was to protect convoys in the North Atlantic and on the routes from the UK to Murmansk carrying supplies to the Soviet Union. The Flower-class corvette was originally designed for offshore patrol work, and was not ideal as an anti-submarine escort; they were really too short for open ocean work, too lightly armed for anti-aircraft defence, and little faster than the merchantmen they escorted, a particular problem given the faster German U-boat designs then emerging. They were very seaworthy and maneuverable, but living conditions for ocean voyages were appalling. Because of this the corvette was superseded in the Royal Navy as the escort ship of choice by the frigate, which was larger, faster, better armed and had two shafts. However, many small yards could not produce vessels of frigate size, so an improved corvette design, the Castle class, was introduced later in the war, some remaining in service until the mid-1950s. |
gblawson |
One corvette remains, that I know of, HMCS Sackville is tied up at the Marine Museum of the Atlantic in Halifax N.S. |
J.D. Hine |
This thread was discussed between 20/12/2009 and 23/12/2009
MG TD TF 1500 index
This thread is from the archive. The Live MG TD TF 1500 BBS is active now.